Advice You
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Business > Careers Employment > That's My Story And I'm Sticking To It

Tags

  • challenges
  • manning
  • these results
  • these results
  • these results

  • Links

  • Heart Rate Monitor Reviews
  • Jones Joins Cleveland Cavaliers with Four-year Contract
  • Article Submission Services-Get Your Website Recognized Globally
  • Advice You - That's My Story And I'm Sticking To It

    If you're a hiring manager that utilizes pre-employment assessments, check out Jonathan P. Niednagel and his website/blog, BrainTypes.com. The guy drives me nuts
    According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product
    for no other reason than the fact that he updates so infrequently and I really like what he has to say. His area of expertise is in professional athletics and he'
    ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

    Examples of combination products may in
    s made a name for himself working as a personnel consultant to several high-profile sports teams across the NFL, NBA and MLB. Because athletes in team sports typi
    lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

    cally receive guaranteed, multi-year contracts, teams are under tremendous pressure to thoroughly screen and evaluate the players before making long-term financia
    here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe
    l commitments.

    Niednagel gained national attention in 1998 with his pre-draft assessments of Peyton Manning and Ryan Leaf, the #1 and 2 picks respectively, in th
    d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

    Combination pro
    NFL draft that year. He stated that based on his analysis of their individual brain types, Manning would become a superstar in the NFL while Leaf would struggle.
    ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc
    Manning is the reining Super Bowl MVP; Leaf has been out of the league since 2002 and is now an assistant college coach.

    Neidnagel's "brain typing" theory is a
    easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi
    derivative of the old Myers-Briggs personality tests that classifies individuals based on a combination of preferences such as feeling, thinking, sensing, perceiv
    nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically
    ing, etc. (A good site for discovering your own brain type is Socionics -- I test out as an ESTP: extroverted, sensing, thinking and perceiving).

    What I find int
    and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ
    eresting about his work is that he claims these preferences manifest themselves through motor skills such as eye contact, voice inflection, body movements (the wa
    ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi
    you walk, hand gestures), etc., so you can determine a person's brain-type or innate "wiring" without them having to take a self-assessment test. He believes, as
    ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

    Following aspects would a
    do I, that self-assessments produce inaccurate results, particularly when it comes to pre-employment testing, due to a number of reasons:

    * Multiple perceptions
    dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

    Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
    Which combination prod
    : most people feel they act differently in different settings. "At home I'm fun loving and gregarious, but at work I'm strictly business." I've had people ask me
    cts are meaningful and rational?
    Which therapeutic categories to select?
    Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
    Do combin
    before taking a personality assessment, "Am I supposed to answer this how I think I am or how I think other's perceive me?" The result is usually a combination of
    tions increase the patient compliance?
    What would be the developing cost?
    How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen
    those two perspectives.


    * Skewed perception of self: too often we see ourselves differently than the rest of world sees us. Remember the first time you hear
    t?

    As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel
    a recording of your own voice?


    * Manipulated results: Candidates recognize how much is riding on these results and make adjustments to their answers based o
    ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

    Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust
    n what they think the company wants to see. I've had clients that will not speak with a candidate unless the results from their pre-assessment comes back favorabl
    y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products
    y--regardless of what their resume says.

    Neidnagel claims that even when you take a self-assessment with no vested interest in the outcome, the results are only
    .

    As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de
    75% accurate. Basing a hiring decision on these results is like heading off on a cross-country trip with only 75% of the directions being correct. If you (or your
    elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

    Companies that provide selfless information through particip
    company) insist on using pre-assessments as part of your candidate screening process, I recommend their weight be no more than 10% of the overall hiring criteria


    tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.adviceyou.org.ua/article/9214/adviceyou-Thats-My-Story-And-Im-Sticking-To-It.html">That's My Story And I'm Sticking To It</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.adviceyou.org.ua/article/9214/adviceyou-Thats-My-Story-And-Im-Sticking-To-It.html]That's My Story And I'm Sticking To It[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Business Basics - How To Develop A Successful Business

    Once You Have Decided To Make The Use Of Business Cards

    3 Simple But Powerful Off-Line Advertising Strategies

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com

    nieautoryzowano brak autoryzacji 905 sprawdz autoryzacje brak autoryzacji